| | | | | | |

Lost Witness of the Restoration: William Law & the 1887 Interview

William Law was an Irish-born, Scotch-descended, Canadian doctor. He was converted in 1836 under the influence of John Taylor’s Saja-Boys-worthy vocals (not the first or the last). He was four years younger than the American Prophet of Mormonism, but as time would show, his maturity far outstripped Joseph’s. Law was trained as a doctor and if his manner elsewhere reflects his health care, he was quick, efficient, and caring as a practitioner. He was a true believer in the new religion and his first conversion experiences were so strong that he continued to affirm his belief for a while even after Joseph’s death and the other Saints wanted him killed.

In 1839, the Latter-day Saints were straggling out of Adam-ondi-Ahman (Missouri) because of the Extermination Order and setting up camp in the swamp that would become Nauvoo. It wasn’t much of a destination yet, but William and Jane, his wife, stepped into leadership in order to guide a healthy cohort of Canadian Saints to join the main group in Illinois. 

When William arrived in Nauvoo, he watched Joseph closely. Feeling him to be sincere, he accepted the task of serving a short mission to the Eastern states and then, at Joseph’s urging, he set up as a businessman, despite his background in medicine. He must have fulfilled these expectations admirably because he quickly singled out for leadership. About a year after his first arrival in Nauvoo, William was chosen as Second Counselor to replace Joseph’s brother Hyrum, who had been assigned the role of Patriarch. William was a natural leader: determined, hardy, honest, financially prosperous. In that way, it is easy to imagine William blending into any modern-day Church ward as a charismatic Bishop or generous Stake President. In later years, William would reflect that he believed himself to have been chosen precisely because he could be used as an earnest face for representing the Church, while Joseph conducted his affairs (sexual and otherwise) behind the scenes. 

After this initial bloom of success in Nauvoo though, things went downhill. Within weeks of being selected as Second Counselor, William watched Joseph select newcomer John C. Bennett as the mayor of Nauvoo and then, two months later, watched Joseph invent a new title (Assistant to the President) to make Bennett second in command. With both political, social, and theocratic power to back them up, Bennett and Joseph worked the Nauvoo circuit for their own pleasures for the next year and a half while William stayed busy (and largely unaware) of their activities. William considered Bennett a “scoundrel” but seems to have tolerated him without much fuss. Just over a year after this rise to power, Bennett was abruptly excommunicated in May 1842. He left in a storm and soon after published a searing exposé of Joseph’s spiritual wifery or polygamy. In the modern day, we can corroborate Bennett’s account as accurate, however his fiery departure and sudden flip in loyalties, left William and others feeling betrayed. They defended Joseph as boldly as they could, not realizing that Joseph continued throughout 1842 to add approximately one woman a month to his list of Celestial concubines. 

The next year in 1843, Emma and Joseph were wrestling over the secret brides. Joseph’s scribe William Clayton indicates in his diary that Emma began asking for Joseph for her own extramarital consort (since Joseph had so many), and her “sweet little man” of choice, was William Law. Joseph needed to corral Emma so he dashed off a damnation-filled polygamy manifesto (now known as D&C 132) in the spring of 1843 to convince her. “The Revelation,” as it came to be known, denied Emma her request, draped Joseph with glory, and threatened destruction if she did not submit to his authoritarian husbandry. Emma bowed briefly to say yes, got sealed to Joseph as a 20-something eternal concubine on Mary 28, 1843. Just two days before this, William Law had also been inducted into Joseph’s anointed ring of Endowed elders, which means that it is likely Emma and William Law went through the first part of the ceremony together at that time. 

Later in 1843, Emma again hated polygamy, and that seems to be the same time at which Joseph summoned William (and Jane) for formal induction into the Practice. There would come to be many stories of how William and Joseph fell out. Some of them were that Joseph had secretly propositioned Jane for a plural wife, that William had committed adultery and Joseph would not let him be sealed to anyone, or that Jane had propositioned Joseph to be a plural wife. The account that William relates below sounds the most historical and the most in-character for all involved parties. As William relates himself: in 1843, Joseph sent Hyrum to read the Revelation on polygamy to William. Hyrum then sent William home to share the news with Jane. William wanted to believe the document was a hoax, but Jane had been hearing Relief Society gossip long enough to suspect it was true. When William confronted Joseph about it directly, Joseph doubled down. William and Jane talked through their options in private and then refused.

The ensuing months were rough. Joseph fired William from the Church hierarchy and then excommunicated him completely. In plain terms, Joseph was trying to force William’s hand by ripping away his status and spiritual salvation. William standing in the community was so strong, however, that Joseph felt he must act carefully to avoid angering the group. Joseph seems to have tried to kill William through assassins or at least bankrupt him, but William was able to avoid these attempts. The tension between them finally burst in June 1844, when William published the modest exposé of the Nauvoo Expositor and Joseph reacted by tearing apart William press and barn. Fortunately, the Laws were not in town at the time of the mob sabotage that Joseph had asked for, but the assault on their property did result in Joseph’s arrest and incarceration in Carthage.

(By the way, if you haven’t already: You need to read the Nauvoo Expositor.)

Just after the zenith of 1844, Joseph was dead from mob violence. He had been awaiting trial in which William was to testify. Though William had nothing to do with the murder and no connection was ever made between him and the crime, the faithful wanted revenge and William was the image on whom they placed the most vitriol. For years afterwards, Utah Saints (aided by their leaders) would gossip about William Law’s murder plots, make their own plots to murder him, and fabricate good-guy-bad-guy folk tales to justify their hatred.

William Law as a Witness & A Personal Connection

In my own family, one polygamous wife, perhaps feeling the awful press of ignominy in her own life, used William Law for her own ends. She began telling stories of her own ancestor dramatically saving Joseph from a dastardly plot by William Law. Later, one of her descendants forged a diary (complete with anachronistic “dear diary,” superscripts) to illustrated this valiant ancestor foiling the scheme. The ancestor (Charles Stoddard) supposedly ran through the night to inform Joseph, thus saving his life from the villainous Law. The story was never corroborated by history and the style and nature of the storytelling betray it as a plea for family fame. Still, my family believed the lie. And even after it was formally debunked by actual historians and informed of their error, my extended family continues to fondle the myth of bad-guy William Law.

As one of the pivotal characters on Joseph’s inner circle in the 1840s, though, William Law holds extra significance in witnessing the early Church. As a businessman and leader in the Church in Nauvoo, he saw the organization in full expression before it was mythologized and concretized by Brigham and later members. As an anointed quorum member, he saw more of mechanics of Joseph running his theocracy than any of the early Witnesses like David Whitmer or Oliver Cowdery. As a member who turned into a leader who turned into an apostate, he saw all sides of the Church’s character. And, as one of the few honest men who assessed the Church frankly and with his best judgment throughout his association with Joseph and who didn’t dissolve into something like madness (like it seems Martin Harris did), he offers a response that is more relatable to the modern Church member or investigator than any of Joseph’s 19th century loyalists or modern Church apologists. 

By standards of legal testimony too, William Law is an excellent and reliable testimony. He was a first-hand witness to Joseph’s leadership and conduct in Nauvoo, he published his own views with no intermediary or scribe through the Nauvoo Expositor and then was then quoted 40 years later with a completely coherent view of the events, even after many years of distance from Mormonism. This is a consistency that Joseph with his various scribes, inconsistent doctrines, and variable First Vision accounts never achieved. William’s consistency between both his still-hopefully-believing stance of 1844 and his post-Mormon mindset of 1887 attests to the clarity of his memory, the reality of his claims, and the coherence of his character.

In addition, William’s testimonies on both sides of belief in the Church worked against his vested interest, which again indicates their truthfulness. In 1844 he published the Expositor as a believer, but knowing it would put him in danger in Nauvoo. In 1887, after losing the modern equivalent of over $1 Million in assets to Joseph’s slander, his reputation, and his community, he had only shame for being involved with Mormonism, yet he still did not condone Joseph’s murder. He recounted with “wet eyes” that he considered “the killing of Joseph Smith a wrong action” and said that if he had known of such a plan, he “would have taken steps to stop it.” 40 years distant from the 1844 murders, he had nothing to lose by dehumanizing Joseph or washing his hands over the Smith graves and saying “good riddance,” yet he didn’t. Additionally, his recounting of names, events, and circumstances aligns with the documentary evidence of Nauvoo and his account has only become more credible with time (another feat that Joseph did not achieve). 

Though Law saw Mormonism as his greatest mistake and regretted becoming involved, modern day persons affected by Mormonism should be very grateful that he was there. The sincere faith that led him to immigrate, his dedicated service in the first Presidency during the Nauvoo years, his courage in publishing the Expositor, and his personal integrity as a witness afterwards gave him an intimate, balanced, and thorough perspective of the early Church. His story is also a harrowing reminder about the cost of cult leaders and their infatuated followings. The record he left behind is more relevant, more personal, and more corroborated by history than all 3 + 8 Witnesses and every Church leader of that time, including Joseph, put together. 

For all of these reasons, I consider the testimony of William Law to be the most important witness of Joseph Smith and 19th Century Mormonism. 

I grew up believing this man to be a villain. I was told family stories of him as a traitor, a murderer, a sneering demon from hell. I was totally unprepared for how wholesome I found him to be. His honesty, courage, and generosity shine through everything he published or recorded. If there was a 19th Century man who deserved to be honored as a fallible martyr and a not-perfect-but-still-truthful “prophet,” it would be William Law. He never asked for this honor and he never needed a secret inner ring to affirm himself. After he left Nauvoo, he shelved his sorrow and blended back into a frontier community like the one he had come from in Toronto. Some might see this as a defeat or a fall from divine purpose, but I see it as a magnificent recovery. Unlike the other Witnesses who split with Joseph, William never tried to recreate his Mormon experience elsewhere. Unlike the Church leaders who came after him, he unequivocally and sincerely stood for truth. Unlike the Church members he had served, he never called for bloody vengeance or published fantasy dramas about defeating them. Unlike his peers in Joseph’s anointed inner circle, he assessed polygamy correctly as corrupt and abusive and never inflicted that trauma on Jane or his children. Instead, he invested lived in vibrant partnership with her for nearly 50 years and they raised 8 well-adjusted children. He died naturally in 1892 without ever falling into another trap of religious zealotry. 

Because of William Law, a line was drawn in the sand and every person since 1844 has had the opportunity to see Joseph Smith and Mormonism as a cult system. 

Because of William Law, we know that Joseph was truly a 1984-style manipulator seeking to control a populace through controlling a narrative. 

Because of William Law, we have a direct viewing portal into Nauvoo and do not need to make flimsy excuses about “history being a different country” in which people are ethically strange. 

He responded to the same offenses to conscience that modern readers have. He called out the same crimes and abuses of power that we still consider heinous. In my view, this makes William Law the last Mormon Church Leader of real integrity.

I hope that this republishing of his 1887 interview allows modern readers to interact directly with his words more easily and restore the dignity he lost to the LDS smear campaigns. It is a small gesture, but since I can’t change the past, I can do this.


Editorial notes: I have rearranged the questions so that they are chunked up by topic and easily searchable for Modern Readers through the quick links. I have also filled in names that were abbreviated for the newspaper version of this article and added footnotes for translation of 19th Century slang and dollar amounts to aid comprehension. I have also removed the original biography written by Dr. Wyl, since I wrote the above biography. A full interview with no textual additions is available for download below, as is the full original article by William Wyl.

ASTOUNDING REVELATIONS OF DARKNESS

A Deeply Interesting Talk on Old Nauvoo Days.

Political Chicanery, Trickery, Deceit and Murder–Licentiousness and Fraud–Drunkeness and Avariciousness–Robbing Men of Their Money to Make Them Submissive–An Unprecedented Interview.

EDITOR TRIBUNE:–In your issue of July 3rd, by your courtesy, we gave a copy each of three letters from William Law, once one of the “heads” of the Mormon “Church,” to Dr. William Wyl. Those letters spoke for themselves as from a truthful, conscientious and intelligent man, still suffering in his feelings from his former connection with the religious and political fraud, Mormonism. In the remarks accompanying the letters, in your paper, we stated that Dr. Wyl had succeeded in obtaining an interview with the venerable Dr. Law–a privilege never accorded to any interviewer before, and we said that it would be furnished ere long for the information and study of your many readers.

In perusing this interview we are impressed with the goodness of heart, the honestly of purpose, the hatred of imposition under guise of religion and politics, and the remorse of soul in being caught in the meshes of such a corrupt and deceitful class of religious adventurers and speculators, displayed by the good old man; and we see, as well, the innocent, unsuspicious and confiding gentleman and Christian becoming a dupe in the system by the pretension and sophistical arguments of the delusion. 

Many fearful deeds and horrible acts were perpetrated in Nauvoo, of which he knew nothing, and only whisperings and innuendoes caught his ear of many of the dark plots and secrets. But when their trickery and treason became so bold and daring his eyes with those of many other good men and women, were opened and they saw more and more that shocked their sensibilities and they exposed the hypocrisy and schemes of the unholy priesthood. 

Like an honest man, that had the courage of his convictions, he dared to beard the lions in their dens, dared to speak out, and try to counteract the designs of the leaders. His statement of the false revelation on polygamy is interesting as showing how it was tinkered up afterwards to make it more plausible, and, also, that as in many of the so-called revelations of that church many alterations were effected to deceive the credulous and uncritical. Poor innocent Mr. Law thought that Joe Smith would repudiate the document and pronounce it false, but the dear Mrs. Law knew more of Joe’s falsity, impure teachings and practices than did the man, and she said at once that the false prophet would declare it was from God.

The low cunning and deceit of Joe and Hyrum Smith–par nobile fratrum!!–on the political question is well exposed by their dragging in their God to father their little schemes. Let the reader notice well how the brothers worked and deceived both political parties to their selfish end. Joe’s nefarious ending of the presumption and double dealing is a study of itself that all those who sympathize with Mormon politics under the mask of “rights” would do well to consider. It is no better now, and would be no better hereafter–Mormonism never learns or improves. It is well-known that the heads and feet of the Mormon Church pose and pretend that they are Democrats, but if both houses of Congress were largely Republican the Mormons would be Republican too, to gain an end, especially Statehood.

This is proved beyond contradiction to be true by the fact that both “apostle” George A. Smith and “apostle” George Q. Cannon, representing the “church” by Brigham’s revelation were sent to and presented themselves as Republicans delegates at the great Republican convention held a few years ago in Philadelphia–they were rejected, however, and the American gentleman and patriot, Judge McKean with another were accepted; and from the other fact that George Q. Cannon, as Delegate from Utah appeared upon the Records of Congress as Democrat and as Republican in two different terms. Legislators, Americans, be not deceived by the apostles or prophets of Mormonism either in politics or religion.

The testimony of Dr. Law is a fearful arraignment of Emma, Joe’s wife, but it is in accordance with other facts well known to many here, and it ought to be a matter for the better class of Mormons, the Josephites, to reflect upon–false, false, all false, the words and testimony she gave.

The ostracism that characterizes Mormonism here existed in Nauvoo, and ever will with its leaders–like Ishmael, “their hand is against every man, and every man’s hand is against them.” ” [sic] But we hope that this exposé of the whole treasonable and deceitful theocratico-politico government which not only threatens our liberties here but would sap the foundation of all just democratic government, will enable some of our Mormon neighbors and Gentile sympathizers to diagnosis the disease that affects the body politic.

But I give at once the interview obtained by the intelligent, careful and persistent Dr. Wyl with the honest, truthful and good-hearted Dr. Law. Let our readers ponder it carefully–it is worth more than gold:

Interview with Wm. Law. March. 30, 1887

Dr. William Law lives with his son, Judge “Tommy” Law. The house is a fine cottage, large, well-kept grounds surround it. We entered a cheerful looking room and there sat William Law, dressed in black, a most venerable looking figure. The head has a striking expression of intelligence, the large clear eyes are of a remarkably deep steel blue; the general impression is that of a thinker, of a benevolent and just man. He greeted me in a fatherly way. I expressed my joy at seeing at last so important a witness of a history, to whose study I had devoted two years.

Assassination Attempt of Governor Boggs

I sat down near the venerable figure. I hesitated to put any question to him, but he made my task easy by saying: “You speak, in your book, of Joseph Smith having sent Rockwell to kill Governor Boggs. Let me tell you, that Joe Smith, told me the fact himself. The words were substantially like this, “I sent Rockwell to kill Boggs, but he missed him, it was a failure; he wounded him instead of sending him to Hell.”

This beginning gave me some courage and I began the pumping business, in a cautious way, though, that I might not frighten my subject. I had put down in my notebook a score of questions or so. So I glanced over them now and then, stealthily, and ventured this or that question, waiting till the good doctor would get warm in the recollections of the past. This happened soon and then I could ask with more liberty.

“What position had Rockwell in Joseph’s house?”

“Rockwell was the lackey of the house. He used to comb and shave Joseph, blackened his boots and drove his carriage. He would have done anything Joe wanted him to do. I never saw a horse or carriage belonging to Rockwell which you say he got from Joseph for the attempt to kill Boggs.”

Conversion of William Law

“How did you become a Mormon, Doctor?”

“John Taylor and Almon W. Babbitt came as missionaries to Canada and preached where I lived, twenty-five miles south of Toronto. I believe that Taylor was sincere then and I believe he was to a late day. Finally the greed of power and money killed his conscience. There was, now and then, a good man in Mormondom, for instance Wm. Marks. He was a very good man and knew as little of the secret crimes of the leaders as I knew myself.”

Practicing Medicine

“Did you practice medicine in Nauvoo, Doctor?”

“Only occasionally. I came to Nauvoo with money. I had had a mill in Canada, already. Joseph said to me: ‘You must not be a doctor here. Buy lands, build mills and keep a store to keep you running. As to practicing and not making anything, let some Gentiles come and do that. You look out for business and profit. I practiced, however, occasionally. Once John Taylor was taken with a very malignant fever. He was treated by his regular physician. I think Dr. Wells was his name. He grew worse and worse. At last I was called in, saw him and prescribed for him. They followed my prescriptions and he got better. This is, I believe, the worst thing I did in Nauvoo or anywhere else!” –[Dr. Law followed this joke with a chuckle, so as to give me to understand that it was a sin to cure so great a rascal]

Joseph’s Manner, Dress, Cowardice, and Wrestling

“What kind of a life did the prophet lead in Nauvoo?”

“Joseph lived in great plenty. He entertained his friends and had a right good time. He was a jolly fellow. I don t think that in his family tea and coffee were used, but they were served to the strangers when he entertained as tavern-keeper. At least, I suppose so. The Smiths had plenty of money. Why, when I came to Nauvoo I paid Hyrum $7001 in gold for a barren lot and at that rate they sold any amount of lots after having got the land very cheap, to be sure Their principle was to weaken a man in his purse, and in this way take power and influence from him. Weaken everybody, that was their motto. Joseph’s maxim was, when you have taken all the money a fellow has got, you can do with him whatever you please.”

“Was Joseph a habitual drunkard?”

“I don’t believe he was. I only saw him drunk once. I found Joseph and Hyrum at a place where they kept quantities of wine. I remember that Joseph drank heavily, and that I talked to Hyrum begging him to take his brother away, but that was the only time I saw the prophet drunk.”

“In what manner would Joseph succeed to keep you and others from knowing what was going on behind the curtain?”

“Marks, Yves, I and some others had, for a long time, no idea of the depravity that was going on. This was simply the result of a very smart system adopted by the prophet and his intimate friends like Brigham Young, Kimball and others. They first tried a man to see whether they could make a criminal tool out of him. When they felt that he would not be the stuff to make a criminal of, they kept him outside the inner circle and used him to show him up as an example of their religion, as a good, virtuous, universally respected brother.”

“Was Joseph a coward?”

“Yes, he was a coward and so was Hyrum. You see it already in the fact that when I attacked him on the street with most violent words, he did not dare to answer a word.”

“How did the prophets dress?”

“Joe and Hyrum were always dressed well, generally in blue, sometimes in black. Joseph was a fine man, no doubt of it.”

“How was it with Joseph’s wrestling?”

“The forces of the prophet in this line have been exaggerated. My brother Wilson wrestled once with him and he laid him down on the floor like a baby. Wilson could throw a lead bar much farther than Joe could. But Wilson was an uncommonly fine and strong man, over 6 feet. He could hold a weight of 56 pounds on his little finger and write his name on the wall in big letters. Joseph was flabby; he never worked at anything and that probably made him so. Rockwell did everything about the house.”

About Emma Hale Smith & Lucy Mack and Joseph Sr.

“Did Emma, the elect lady, come to your house and complain about Joseph?”

“No. She never came to my house for that purpose. But I met her sometimes on the street and then she used to complain, especially because of the girls whom Joseph kept in the house, devoting his attention to them. You have overrated her, she was dishonest.”

“Do you mean to say that she was so outside of the influence Joseph had over her?”

“Yes, that is exactly what I mean. Let me tell you a case that will be full proof to you. Soon after my arrive in Nauvoo the two L[awrence] girls came to the holy city, two very young girls, 15 to 17 years of age. They had been converted in Canada, were orphans and worth about $8000 in English gold.2 Joseph got to be appointed their Guardian, probably with the help of Dr. Bennett. He naturally put the gold in his pocket and had the Girls sealed to him. He asked me to go on his bond as a guardian, as Sidney Rigdon had done. “It is only a formality,” he said. Foolishly enough, and not yet suspecting anything, I put my name on the paper. Emma complained about Joseph’s living with the L[awrence] girls,3 but not very violently.4 It is my conviction that she was his full accomplice, that she was not a bit better than he.

When I saw how things went I should have taken steps to be released of that bond, but I never thought of it. After Joseph’s death, A. W. Babbitt became guardian of the two girls. He asked Emma for a settlement about the $8000. Emma said she had nothing to do with her husband’s debts. Now Babbitt asked for the books and she gave them to him. Babbitt found that Joseph had counted an expense of about $3000 for board and clothing of the girls.5 Now Babbitt wanted the $5000 that was to be paid Babbitt, who was a straight, good, honest, sincere man, set about to find out property to pay the $5000 with.6 He could find none. Two splendid farms near Nauvoo, a big brick house, worth from $3000 to $4000, the hotel kept by Joe, a mass of vacant town lots, all were in Emma’s name,7 not transferred later, but transferred from the beginning. She always looked out for her part. When I saw how things stood I wrote to Babbitt to take hold of all the property left by me in Nauvoo and of all claims held by me again in people in Nauvoo. And so the debt was paid by me–Emma didn’t pay a cent.”

“What do you remember about Emma’s relations to the revelation on celestial marriage?”

“Well, I told you that she used to complain to me about Joseph’s escapades whenever she met me on the street. She spoke repeatedly about that pretended revelation. She said once: “The revelation says I must submit or be destroyed. Well, I guess I have to submit.” On another day she said: “Joe and I have settled our troubles on the basis of equal rights.” Emma was a full accomplice of Joseph’s crimes. She was a large, coarse woman, as deep a woman as there was, always full of schemes and smooth as oil. They were worthy of each other, she was not a particle better than he.”

“You have known the parents of the prophet, old Lucy and old Joe, the Abraham of this new dispensation?”

“Oh, yes, I knew them. Old Lucy was in her dotage at that time; she seemed a harmless old woman. Old Joe sold blessings, so much a head, always in the same style–that my sons should be emperors and my daughters mothers of queens, and that everybody should have as many children as there was sands on the shore. Old Joe was an old tramp.”

About John C. Bennett

“How about Dr. John C. Bennett?”

“Bennett was very smart and clever, but a thorough scoundrel. Never could find out the reason of his downfall. Mrs. Pratt8 was a most excellent, pure woman, but the fact that Bennett visited her sometimes, was used by Joseph to ruin her character. He had his spies everywhere, and if a woman refused him, he sent his fellows out to whisper stories around about her.”

“What kind of a physician was Dr. Bennett?”

“He was a physician of the old school. I could not say whether he was very successful as a doctor or not. He was so much occupied for Joseph, that he had no time to attend the sick.”

“Did Joseph pay any salary to this Bismarck of his?”9

“I don’t know, but in that honeymoon of favor, which he enjoyed in his first Nauvoo time, Joseph gave him surely all he wanted.”

“What became of Dr. Bennett?”

“The last thing I heard of him was that he went up the river with a large lot of fancy fowls, a speculation of his.”

The Revelation On Polygamy

“What do you know about the revelation on polygamy?”

“The way I heard of it was that Hyrum gave it to me to read. I was never in a High Council where it was read, all stories to the contrary notwithstanding. Hyrum gave it to me in his office, told me to take it home and read it and then be careful with it and bring it back again. I took it home, and read it and showed it to my wife. She and I were just turned upside down by it; we did not know what to do. I said to my wife, that I would take it over to Joseph and ask him about it. I did not believe that he would acknowledge it, and I said so to my wife. But she was not of my opinion. She felt perfectly sure that he would father it.

When I came to Joseph and showed him the paper, he said: ‘Yes, that is a genuine revelation.’

I said to the prophet: ‘But in the Book of Doctrine and Covenants there is a revelation just the contrary of this.’

‘Oh,’ said Joseph, ‘that was given when the church was in its infancy, then it was all right to feed the people on milk, but now it is necessary to give them strong meat.’

We talked a long time about it, finally our discussion became very hot and we gave it up. From that time on the breach between us became more open and more decided every day, after having been prepared for a long time. But the revelation gave the finishing touch to my doubts and showed me clearly that he was a rascal.

I took the revelation back to my wife and told her that Joseph had acknowledged it. ‘That is what I fully expected.’ said she. ‘What shall we do?’ said I.

She advised me to keep still try to sell my property quietly for what I could get. But I did not follow her advice. My heart was burning. I wanted to tread upon the viper.”

“You returned the revelation to Hyrum?”

“Yes, I did. I was astonished to see in your book that the revelation was such a long document. I remember DISTINCTLY that the original given me by Hyrum was MUCH SHORTER. It covered not more than two or three pages of foolscap. The contents are substantially the same, but there was not that theological introduction. The thing consisted simply in the command of doing it, and that command was restricted to the High Priesthood and to virgins and widows. But as to Joseph, himself, the Lord’s chosen servant, it was restricted to virgins only, to clean vessels, from which to procure a pure seed to the Lord.”

Violence, Robbery, Drowning, and the Danites in Nauvoo

“The letters you wrote me, made me suppose that the Smiths tried to kill you when they saw an enemy in you?”

“They tried to get rid of me in different ways. One was by poisoning. I was already out of the church when Hyrum called one day and invited me for the next day to a reconciliation dinner as he called it, to his house. He said Joseph would come, too. He invited me and my wife. He was very urgent about the matter, but I declined the invitation. Now I must tell you that I, in those dangerous days, did not neglect to look out somewhat for the safety of my person and that I kept a detective or two among those who were in the confidence of the Smiths. That very same evening of the day on which Hyrum had been to my house inviting me, my detective told me that they had conceived the plan to poison me at the reconciliation dinner. Their object was a double one. My going to the dinner would have shown to the people that I was reconciled and my death would have freed them of an enemy. You may imagine that I didn’t regret having declined that amiable invitation.”

“Have you had any knowledge of cases of poisoning in Nauvoo, ordered by the authorities?”

“I know that several men, six or seven, died under very suspicious circumstances. Among them were two secretaries of the prophet, Mulholland10 and Blaskel Thompson.11 I saw Mulholland die and the symptoms looked very suspicious to me. Dr. Foster, who was a very good physician, believed firmly that those six or seven men had been poisoned, and told me so repeatedly.”

“What may have been the reason for poisoning the secretaries?”

(With a smile) “They knew too much, probably.”

“What do you know about the Danites?”

“Nothing of my personal knowledge. They existed, but their workings were kept very secret. I never belonged to the initiated. Smith tried very hard to get them to kill me. One day my detective told me, that two Danites had gone to Joseph and told him that they wanted to put me out of the way. Joseph said: “Don’t–he (Law) is too influential; his death would bring the country down upon us; wait.” Later when I was thoroughly aware of my danger, they tried in all manners to use me up and had Danites all day and night after me, but I looked out and kept myself safe. Whatever there was of crime in Nauvoo, was kept secret. On the outside everything looked nice and smooth. There were lots of strangers every Sunday as visitors and then the best speakers were put on the stand as samples of the fruits of this fine religion.”

“Have you ever heard of the old woman that was drowned in the interest of the church?”

“I have heard of a woman being put aside. They said she had been brought over the river and buried on an island near the shore or on the other shore, near the water. But at that time I did not believe a word of rumors of this kind, and did not investigate them.”

“Did you ever hear of abortion being practiced in Nauvoo?”

“Yes. There was some talk about Joseph getting no issue from all the women he had intercourse with. Dr. Foster spoke to me about the fact. But I don’t remember what was told about abortion. If I heard things of the kind, I didn’t believe in them at that time. Joseph was very free in his talk about his women. He told me one day of a certain girl and remarked, that she had given him more pleasure than any girl he had ever enjoyed. I told him it was horrible to talk like this.”

“What do you know about robbery being practiced for the benefit of the church?”

“That sort of business was kept very secret. Hyrum had once a very fine, brand new blue suit, and people told me the suit was the produce of the spoils of the Gentiles. I have no doubt, that Hyrum played an important role in this department of church affairs. I think I can prove it. There was one day a “little council” called in Hyrum’s office, and I was invited to come. Joseph called at my house and took me to the little council. Eight or ten were present, all leaders in the church. Hyrum made a long argument–said he: “The Missourians have robbed, plundered and murdered our people. We should take our revenge on them as thoroughly as possible, and regain what we have lost in Missouri. The simplest way would be if our people would go to Missouri and buy their horses and cattle on credit and then not pay for them; and our merchants would go to St Louis and take their large quantities of goods on credit and then, when the notes became due, simply not pay them; our people always go there and pay for everything. That’s foolish, very foolish, but it is just the thing that, for instance, Brother Law is doing. He has paid thousands of dollars there; but get all these things from them for nothing, horses, cattle and goods, that would help the people wonderfully. Our merchants should transfer all they have–not only their stock in trade, but their lots, houses and farms, too; to their wives and friends in general, so that the creditors could not get a cent out of them.” Some of those present applauded the proposition, and said that would be only fair. I said nothing. Then somebody said: Brother Law has said nothing. I said: This seems to me not only wrong and unjust, but at the same time very ridiculous, because it is not practicable. You cannot buy horses and cattle on credit without having established a credit by long trading; and as to St. Louis, I was always of the opinion that the people there had been very good to the Mormons. So you would ruin your friends to injure your enemies, punish the innocent to hurt the guilty. The St. Louis merchants were surely not the men that persecuted you in Missouri. Hyrum got up, furious. ready to attack me. But Joseph rose and said: “I move that we adjourn this meeting. Brother Law has said his opinion, and that is all you wanted from him. Joseph went home with me and on the way he told me that he shared my views fully, and that I had exactly spoken his mind. He praised me very much for the justice and honesty of my views. ‘I did not talk,’ said he, ‘since you took the very words from my lips.’ I need not tell you, that this was diplomacy on Joseph’s part, but Hyrum hated me from that moment, and never forgave me for what I had said at that little council. But Hyrum hated me for another reason.”

“Was that in the robbery line, too?”

“No. That was from a political reason. It was because I opposed him in the dirty political trade he made with Hoge against Walker. Walker had bought Joseph’s influence by declaring that the city charter of Nauvoo secured the habeas corpus. I stood by them when Joseph promised that he should have nine out of every ten Mormon votes. But Hyrum went to Galena to meet the Democratic convention there, and promised the support of the church to Mr. Hoge for a seat in Congress.

Yes, General Hyrum Smith was to sit in Congress next year. Saturday came and I went to Hyrum and had a talk with him. He said he would tell the people to vote for Hoge, and I said I would oppose him on the stand. He made objections but finally had to consent to my speaking on the stand in this matter. When it came to the speaking in public Hyrum did all he could to obstruct me by putting longwinded speakers on the stand, one after the other, so that it was nearly dark when I got on the stand.

Now, I showed the people how shamefully they had treated Mr. Walker, and I made such an impression that they began to shout for Mr. Walker. Then, Hyrum jumped on the stand and declared that he had a revelation from the Lord, that the people should vote for Mr. Hoge. This was Saturday. Sunday morning I went to Joseph and told him what Hyrum had done. We went over to the meeting and Joseph told Hyrum what I had said. Hyrum insisted that he had had a revelation. Oh, said Joseph, if this is a revelation, then it is all right, and he went on the stand and said to the people: ‘My office is so high, that I could not think of bothering the Lord with political affairs. But brother Hyrum has had a revelation–when the Lord speaks let the people obey.’”

Joseph’s Money

“Did you ever hear Joseph speak of his money?”

“Oh yes, he used to boast of his riches. He expressed the opinion, that it was all-important that he should be rich. I heard him say myself, ‘it would be better that every man in the church should lose his last cent, than that I should fall and go down.’”

William Law’s Opinion of Joseph Smith

“You think that Joseph was an infidel?”

“Yes, that he was I have not the slightest doubt. What proofs have I? Well, my general and intimate knowledge of his character. And is it possible that a man who ascribes all kinds of impudent lies to the Lord, could have been anything else but an infidel?”

“Did you ever see the celebrated peepstone?”

“No. I never saw it and I never saw Joseph giving a revelation. But Hyrum told me once that Joseph, in his younger years, used to hunt for hidden treasures with a peepstone.”

“Had you ever some dramatic scene with Joseph about the difficulties between you and him?”

“He avoided me. But once I got hold of him in the street and told him in very plain terms what I thought of him. I said: ‘You are a hypocrite and a vulgar scoundrel, you want to destroy me.’ Instead of knocking me down, which he could have done very easily, being so much bigger and stronger than I, he went away hurriedly without uttering a single word.”

The Nauvoo Expositor12 & Financial Loss

“Were you in Nauvoo when the Expositor was destroyed?”

“No. I was in Carthage. There was a meeting at the court house, many people were present and it was considered what should be done regarding the Mormons. I think Stephen A. Douglas was present at the meeting. My friends urged me to come to Carthage with the press immediately. No conclusion was arrived at, however. The same evening we went home and when we came to Nauvoo we rode over our type, that was scattered in the street, and over our broken office furniture. The work of Joseph’s agents had been very complete; it had been done bv a mob of about 200. The building, a new, pretty brick structure, had been perfectly gutted, not a bit had been left of anything.”

“Had anything been prepared for a second number?”

“Yes, the inside of number two had been set up. Seeing what had been done, I my abode, for safety’s sake, at my brother’s. I left Nauvoo on a large new steam ferry-boat, which transported me, my family and my brother to Burlington, Iowa. While we had people packing our things in my house, we rode, my brother and I, through the city in an open carriage, to show that we were not afraid.”

“What kind of men were the other editors of the Expositor?”

“Dr. Foster was a fine physician and surgeon and a very agreeable, lively, interesting man. The Higbees had been very good friends of Joseph in Missouri and had served his cause there with a kind of boyish enthusiasm. Frank died long ago and Chauncey only lately. He had studied law, was an attorney and sat on the bench for a while. He was quite intelligent. The father of the Higbees had been an excellent man. He died rather suddenly, and from that time there was something between his boys and Joseph.”

“I suppose that you originated the Expositor, Doctor Law?”

“Yes, I originated the idea to publish that paper. I had friends in many parts of the country. They knew that I had become a member of the Mormon religion. I wanted to show them, by publishing the paper, that I had not been in a fraud willingly (here the old man’s eyes filled with tears and his voice trembled). I started the idea, and my brother, Wilson, stood to me like a brother should. I don’t remember whether it was I, or not, who gave the name “Expositor.” But I and my brother, we gave the money, about $2000.13 I gave the biggest part. The Higbees etc., had scarcely a dollar in it.”

“You were well off at that time. Dr. Law?”

“We had property to the amount of about $30,000,14 which was a good deal in those days. We had farms in Nauvoo, city lots and our residences. My brother had a fine brick two story building. By starting the Expositor we lost nearly everything.”

“Didn’t you have a store and a mill?”

“Yes, we had a large steam flour and saw mill and a store. It would have been the smart thing to do, to remain quiet, sell our property without noise for what we could get and move away. That would have been smart, but I wasn’t cool and smart then. I wanted to do my duty and nothing else, and didn’t care for the consequences, not a bit. Many friends advised me to be smart and remain quiet, but I would not hear of it and spoke my mind whenever an opportunity offered. When the Smiths saw that we were against them, then they applied to us their usual system, that is, to freeze us out. Secret orders went out that nobody could buy property without the permission of Joseph Smith, Hyrum or the authorities, as they called them, so our property was practically worthless. Yes, my brother Wilson stood to me like a man, fully, fearlessly. He died, here in Shullsburgh, of a stroke of apoplexy, after an illness of three days, ten years ago. He was a very fine and tremendously strong man. He wrestled with Joe in Nauvoo and threw him on his back.”

“What opinion have you of Governor Ford?”

“Ford made a good impression upon me; he was surely a good, straight man.”

William Law Leaves Nauvoo

“I told you that the Smiths tried to poison me. When Joseph saw that I had no great appetite for reconciliation dinners, he tried with the Indians. The plan was, that somebody should use me up who was not openly connected with the church, he was yet afraid of the people because of my influence. Later he would have killed me without any regard. One day about one hundred redskins came to town and twenty or thirty were sent to my house. We tried to get rid of them, but could not and we saw clearly that they had a dark plan for the night. But we had to keep them, gave them blankets and they were all night in our hall. Wilson Law, I and some friends, though, kept good watch all night, with barricaded windows and doors and guns and pistols ready.”

“Did you ever see Joseph again after you left Nauvoo?”

“Only once. I saw him in Carthage at the trial. We spoke not to each other and he seemed greatly preoccupied. We left Nauvoo on the second day after the passing of the ordinance which put the press under the absolute will of Joseph and his creatures. This ordinance gave them power to imprison and fine us at liberty.”

Did William Law know about the mob that would kill Joseph?

“Had you any idea that there was a sort of conspiracy to kill Joseph in jail?”

“No. I had no idea, no idea. I had been ruined by that man; all my property was gone; all my dearest illusions destroyed, and through my connection with him I got a black spot on my life, which will pain me to the very last minute of my existence. But I tell you [The old gentlemen buried his head in his hands and when he removed them, his eyes were wet.] I tell you, no, if I had had any idea of any such scheme, I would have taken steps to stop it. I have always considered the killing of Joseph Smith a wrong action. It is my opinion that he deserved his fate fully, much more than thousands of men who paid the penalty of their crime to Judge Lynch–but I would have preferred that he should have been tried by court and sent to the Penitentiary.”

Wyl: After pumping the dear, good old Doctor for two hours. I relaxed my hold on him and our conversation began to run on in an easier style. He made some interesting remarks, still, indeed he didn’t say anything that wasn’t interesting, every instance bearing the strong impress of his keen intelligence and interesting strong, manly character.

What Saved William from Death

Let me quote one more detail. Said William. Law: “What saved me from death in 1844 was, 1, my caution; 2, the devotion of my detectives and 3, Joseph himself. He had inculcated into the minds of his followers the rule, that the “heads” of the church must be safe before all. This became a strong superstition in the minds of his people, so strong that they did not dare to touch me. And he himself feared me so much because of my popularity and good standing, that he tried for a long time to put me out of the way in a manner that the church could not be charged with it. At last, however, he became desperate and would have killed me in any manner–but then it was too late in the day.”

Part 2: Dr. Wyl Interviews William Law’s Son, Judge Tommy Law and Other Neighbors

What I got out of the venerable Patriarch, William Law, the friends of the study of Mormon History owe entirely to the masterly tact and diplomacy of Judge Law, the son of the good Doctor. Judge Tommy J. Law is an attorney and the publisher of a very successful weekly paper. He is a splendid figure of a man, with a flowing beard, every inch a whole hearted, frank gentleman.

He venerates his father and the memory of his mother. “My father,” he says proudly, “was considered the best speaker in the Mississippi valley; many men said he would have beaten Beecher had he followed that career. I heard him myself some thirty years ago, deliver a Fourth of July speech. He kept his audience spellbound, his influence was truly magnetic. Wilson Law was one of the finest and strongest of men, but intellectually he was below my father. He was a few years older and died 70 years old. He had been a farmer for many years. We are five boys, two are lawyers, two doctors, and one is a merchant. John is a leading physician in Leadville, Colorado. He is 45 years. The merchant, now a man of about 54, R. S. Law, lives in California. William Law junior lives in Chicago and is a very successful law practitioner. W. R. Law, a physician, about 40 years old (the youngest) lives in Darlington, Wisconsin. Our only sister, Mrs. Douglas, is the wife of the president of the Shullsburgh Bank. My mother was a most excellent woman, good to the people in the highest degree, charitable, visiting the sick. Everybody loved her and the whole country turned out when she was buried. My father received a terrible shock through her death. I don’t believe there was ever a happier couple. For many months after her death he used to break down whenever he saw anybody who had known her. We all thought he would follow her soon. But he rallied, though he is yet unable to speak of her without tears. What has been said about Joseph having made an attempt on her is not true. In such a case my father would not have started a paper against him–he would have shot his head off. No man can be more delicate and conscientious about the relations of husband and wife and more apt to be terrible in such a case, than my father. Two years ago he had an attack of pneumonia. My brother came from Leadville and nursed father for two weeks. His life was despaired of but he rallied once more. He said at that time: “Well, my life has anyhow been a failure.”

Nobody can cure him of this idea, that Mormonism has ruined his career. A man less sensitive, less retiring would have made capital out of what he knew, lectured all over the country, etc. After leaving Burlington, Iowa, my father came to Wisconsin and lived for many years on a farm. He was the confidential physician of all his neighbors for ten miles around, the most popular physician there ever was. We always want him to give up practicing, but there are so many people who absolutely must have Dr. Law when they are sick.

Judge Tommy Law in Utah

“Yes, I was once in Utah, I saw Brigham Young but had no talk with him. One of his brothers, a very stout man, who kept a store, told me not to be on the street after dark. ‘There are always some hotheaded young fellows,’ said he, ‘who would think of gaining great merit and reputation if they would injure a man of your kind. It is so very difficult to control them–so you had better keep at home after dark.’”

History of the Law Family

This is what Judge Law told me about the history of the Law family: “My father was born in Ireland, Tyrone County, his parents were of Scottish descent. They emigrated to America, when William Law was nine years old. He lived with his parents for years in Pennsylvania; he studied in Philadelphia and Pittsburg [sic]. His father was a wealthy farmer. Wm. Law later emigrated to Canada and married there a lady of the Silverthorn family and lived there till he went to Nauvoo. Wilson Law never lived in Canada. William Law was the youngest of five brothers, and he is the only surviving one.”

Neighbor Opinions

I have tried hard to verify Judge Law’s opinion about his father by asking lots of people in Shullsburgh and on the train. I heard nothing but “Oh, Dr. Law is a fine old gentleman; the most popular man we have round here.” Mr. Sheaby, who keeps the hotel, in which I spent two days, said: “Dr. Law is a good, fine old man, honest and very kind to the people. I don’t think that this old man has a single enemy, and his wife was loved by everybody, too, she was the soul of kindness.”

Parting Words: “God Bless You, Dr. Law”

The good Doctor had been quite sick for a good many weeks and it was very doubtful, whether he would receive me or not. Judge Law convinced him, that I was a pretty decent fellow and succeeded in getting admission for me, though the Doctor had said, pretty energetically, when he heard of my arrival: “I don’t want to be interviewed.” When I had finished my operations, the Dr. said: “I hope you will do the Laws more justice now”–and he said it with a good, dear look in those wonderfully eloquent, steel-blue eyes.

There is nothing in the aspect of the old gentleman that indicates 78 summers, except the white hands, that tremble a little. I said: “God bless you, Dr. Law,” when I went to the door. I looked round and I couldn’t help it–went back to shake his hand once more. I held out both hands; he put aside his black staff and grasped both my hands, and gave me such a hearty, warm, good shake. I said: “Doctor, be cheerful. You will live twenty years yet like William of Prussia. The Williams are a good race, I belong to it myself.”

There is a strong resemblance between the Law and the Godbe movement15 and still a stronger one between the great heart of William Law and the deep, unselfish, noble soul of William S. Godbe. The rebellions of 1844 and 1870, both came from great hearts, that had been destroyed by the lies and driven to despair by the cruel egotism of the Mormon leaders. And while speaking of hearts crushed by Mormonism, was there ever a kinder, a purer, a braver one than that beating in the bosom of Mrs. Sarah Pratt? And was this grand woman’s heart not martyrized a thousand times worse, than those of our justly celebrated friends Law and Godbe? Men can resist, oppose, fight and wound and finally win and overthrow–but the wife and mother, what is her prize? The tears of her children on her grave–that is all. Well, may the Lord–not Joe’s Lord–bless those three Great souls and all those excellent friends that helped me to study and understand Mormon History; and may they all see the downfall of one of the greatest infamies in human history. God bless them all and may He bless the great, good, patriotic paper, the joy of the student, the consolation of the philosopher, the hope of the Gentile and Mormon sufferer.

THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE

W.WYL.

Notes:

  1. $700 in 1840s Nauvoo is $30,297 in 2026 ↩︎
  2. $8000 in English Gold is $345,574 in 2026 ↩︎
  3. Sarah and Maria Lawrence were inducted in Joseph’s polygamy in the spring of 1843, likely around the same time or a few weeks before William Law. ↩︎
  4. “not very violently”: William is saying that Emma did not complain too vehemently about living with the girls. ↩︎
  5. $3000 in 1844 is $129,590 in 2026.
    Note: the price that Joseph charged the Lawrence sisters for “room and board” was exorbitant in the extreme. The number should have been closer to about $600 for hosting the girls for 2 years. ↩︎
  6. $5000 in 1844 is $215,984 ↩︎
  7. “in Emma’s name”: It was very unusual in the 1800s to put property under the name of the wife, unless (as Wyl points out in the original introduction) the person ascribing the property (Joseph, in this case) was intending to commit fraud from the beginning and trying to prevent loss of property. ↩︎
  8. Sarah Pratt, wife to Orson Pratt was also (like William Law) opposed to polygamy. Orson honored his wife’s feeling at first, but eventually caved to the peer pressure of his Priesthood friends. Sarah tried polygamy briefly before leaving her marriage completely around 1868. ↩︎
  9. “this Bismarck of his”: Wyl is comparing John C. Bennett to the political figure of Otto von Bismarck, the German “Iron Chancellor” famous in the 1870s–1880s as the mastermind and enforcer behind the German emperor. Basically, he’s saying that John C. Bennet was a powerful background influence on Joseph and that Jospeh allowed this. ↩︎
  10. James Mulholland became Joseph’s secretary in 1839, after Oliver Cowdery was excommunicated. His “untimely death” as the JS Papers call it happened in November 3, 1839. Joseph married Mulholland’s widow as a plural wife 3 year later. ↩︎
  11. Robert Blaskel (or Blashel) Thompson became Joseph’s scribe from 1840-1841. He died suddenly in August 1841. In 1843, Hyrum married his widow, Mercy Rachel Fielding as a polygamous wife. ↩︎
  12. For some context and a full read of the Nauvoo Expositor, go here. ↩︎
  13. $2000 in 1844 to start the Nauvoo Expositor is $86,393 in 2026 ↩︎
  14. $30,000 in 1844 is $1,295,904 in 2026 ↩︎
  15. The Godbe Movement was a short-lived break-off sect from Utah Mormonism, that lasted from 1869-sometime in the 1880s. The sect valued women’s suffrage, more open communication with the Eastern states, and anti-capitalist economy. ↩︎

Download the 1887 Interview of William Law


Discover more from Laura Randle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Similar Posts

One Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *